| In
the News |
|
|
Curb on coastal land sales to foreigners - 8 December |
|
|
Nick Wilson
Government
yesterday made good on its threat to curb the sale of
land to foreigners, announcing that it had approved
draft legislation aimed at regulating the sale of
coastal land to foreigners and the super-rich.
There
was mixed reaction from property players, with some
adopting a "wait-and-see"
approach and others concerned it could frighten
off foreign investors.
Chief government spokesman Themba Maseko said
the Integrated Coastal Management Bill would soon be
published for public comment.
"With
regard to the
Integrated Coastal Management Bill, cabinet
expressed its concerns about the unmitigated sale of
coastal land, which has the effect of limiting public
access to SA's coastline.
"The
environmental affairs and tourism minister (Marthinus
van Schalkwyk) will announce further details on what
steps government could take to arrest this trend.
Otherwise, South Africans could wake up one day and
discover that only foreign nationals and the super-rich
had access to our coastline,"
said a cabinet statement yesterday.
Van Schalkwyk is expected to provide details
on the bill on Sunday.
Maseko said government was concerned about
the proliferation of housing estates along SA's
coast that limited public access to the sea.
Maseko
said municipalities, provincial governments and some
national government departments were disposing of large
"chunks of land"
to private developers without any "due
consideration" for
"what one would term national
interest".
He
said that some of these new developments closed off
access to the coast to the general public.
"What
cabinet is considering is a way of regulating these
disposals of land in a more responsible way".
Maseko said this could be the first "legal
instrument government is putting on the table as a way
of opening the discussion about the sale of land to
foreigners in this country".
Andrew Golding, CE of real estate group Pam
Golding Properties, said that "one
needs to wait and see what the minister is going to
unveil when he gives us a more detailed briefing".
"I
think it is important not to sensationalise this latest
development and see it in the context of a broader
debate. Generally, government has made a number of
extremely responsible and well thought through decisions
in recent times and I am sure they will similarly apply
their minds to this issue,"
said Golding.
Seeff Properties chairman Samuel Seeff said
government had to give more direction as to what the
parameters were going to be rather than just having an
"open debate".
He said beaches and natural resources should be open to
all and "every potential
development along the coastline"
should have adequate access for people to use the
facilities.
"All
that this does now is fuel concern in the market place
among all buyers. It makes foreigners more concerned
about purchasing property in SA".
Seeff said foreigners had a done a
"tremendous amount"
for the growth of SA's
economy.
Property
economist Francois Viruly, of Viruly Consulting, said SA's
beaches should remain a "public
domain". But he said
foreigners should be made to "play
the property game in the same way as locals do for the
same reason that foreigners are free to invest in our
financial markets".
"I
think one starts entering dangerous ground when one
starts dictating where foreign investors are allowed and
where they are not," he said.
With Sapa
Mail & Guardian website |
|
|
|
Coastal land sale to be curbed - 7
December |
|
|
Cape Town - Draft
legislation aimed at regulating the sale of coastal land
has been approved by the cabinet, and is now set to be
published for public comment.
Briefing the media on
Thursday, government communications head Themba Maseko
said the cabinet was worried about the proliferation of
housing estates along South Africa's coast that limited
public access to the sea.
The briefing follows
the cabinet's fortnightly meeting on Wednesday, at which
the Integrated Coastal Management Bill was discussed.
Maseko said
: "What cabinet is extremely concerned about is
the .
. . mushrooming of
[housing] estates in many parts of the country,
particularly in the Cape, where certain sections of land
are being closed off and sold at a very high price".
Further details of the
bill would be announced by Environmental Affairs
Minister Marthinus van Schalkwyk on Sunday.
Fin24 website |
|
|
|
Foreigners face SA property ban - 7 December |
|
|
Donwald Pressly
The South African
government is to take its first step to regulate foreign
land ownership - particularly along the Cape coastal
area - which it says is being increasingly sold off at
excessively high prices which only foreigners and "the
super rich" can afford.
Fuller detail of the
Integrated
Coastal Management Bill will be made known on
Sunday by Environmental Affairs and Tourism Minister
Marthinus van Schalkwyk.
Government
spokesperson, Themba Maseko, said on Thursday that
cabinet was extremely concerned about "the mushrooming
of estates in many parts of the country particularly in
the Cape".
Certain sections of
land had "basically been closed off and sold off" at a
very high price which "only the super rich and
foreigners" could afford.
Maseko, reading a
written statement on Thursday after Wednesday's cabinet
meeting in Pretoria, said cabinet had expressed its
concern about the unmitigated sale of coastal land
"which has the effect of limiting public access to South
Africa's coastline".
He said the minister of
environmental affairs and tourism "will announce further
details on what steps government could take to arrest
this trend".
"Otherwise South
Africans could wake up one day and discover that only
foreign nationals and the super rich had access to our
coastline," said Maseko.
Focus on foreign
ownership of land first arose in August 2004 when then
Land and Agriculture Minister Thoko Didiza named a
nine-person committee to probe the issue of land
ownership and land use by foreigners headed by Professor
Shadrack Gutto, director of the Centre for African
Renaissance Studies.
Earlier this year Gutto
in an interim report recommended an immediate moratorium
on the sale of land to foreigners.
Fin24 website |
|
|
|
SAfrica to limit foreign buying of coastal property
- 7 December |
|
|
South Africa is in
danger of losing its coastline to rich overseas buyers
and will soon introduce legislation to control the sale
of coastal land to foreigners, officials said on
Thursday.
Environment Minister
Marthinus van Schalkwyk will release the
Integrated
Coastal Management Bill on Sunday, his spokesman
said, in what could be South Africa's first substantial
move to limit foreign access to its real estate market.
South Africa wants to
reverse a trend which has seen coastal land being sold
to foreigners, limiting public access to the coastline,
chief government spokesman Themba Maseko said.
"South Africans could
wake up one day and discover that only foreign nationals
and the super-rich had access to our coastline," he
said.
Rich foreign investors,
many taking advantage of favourable exchange rates, are
buying prime real estate and erecting barriers to
protect their investments, to the chagrin of locals used
to enjoying unfettered access to miles of pristine
beaches.
Maseko said the new
bill "may be the first legal instrument government is
putting on the table as a way of opening the discussion
about the sale of land to foreigners in this country".
Land ownership remains
a highly emotive issue in South Africa, which more than
a decade after the end of apartheid is still grappling
with skewed ownership patterns, with much of the best
property still in white hands.
Foreign property
ownership has also been in the spotlight because of a
jump in real estate prices, especially in prime holiday
areas such as Cape Town where prices have surged beyond
the reach of many local buyers.
While analysts say
foreigners play only a marginal role in South Africa's
real estate market, a government-backed panel earlier
this year recommended a moratorium on all purchases and
sales of property by foreigners until regulations were
passed.
Land Affairs Minister
Thoko Didiza rejected a moratorium after opposition
parties and property associations protested.
The government's
caution over land issues is due partly to lessons learnt
from neighbouring Zimbabwe, where forceful seizures of
white-owned farms have been blamed in part for the
country's economic collapse.
Reuters website
|
|
|
|
Rich people only? - 7 December |
|
|
[Themba Maseko
interviewed by Lesley Williams]
The SA Cabinet
announces it's approved draft
legislation that will prevent the common man from losing
access to coastal areas. Classic Business Day
gets Themba Maseko on the line from the Government
Communication and Information System (GCIS)
Lindsay Williams :
Legislation to regulate the sale of prime South African
real estate to foreigners and the super-rich was
approved by Cabinet today, and will be published for
public comment soon. Themba, this has got all the estate
agents and property moguls up in arms - the first thing
is this seems to single out the super-rich both foreign
and local, but with coastal land prices being what they
are you have to be rich. Can you explain this statement?
Themba Maseko : The
Bill looks at a number of areas, particularly with
regard to developments taking place along the coast. It's
going to be dealing with issues of zoning - the
statement did mention the super-rich and foreigners, but
the main issue of concern is with regard to public
access to the coastal areas of South Africa. We have
issued a correction to say the Bill will not be dealing
with the issue of foreigners - so they will not be
excluded from purchasing properties. The main concern is
that with the developments that are taking place it's
absolutely essential that we develop a framework that
allows the public access to these areas as well.
Lindsay Williams : So
you've taken out
"foreigners"
from that statement? Was there an adverse reaction to
your statement earlier today?
Themba Maseko : We got
a lot of enquiries from the media, and also the
international media. On checking the Bill again for
further clarity it became clear it did not address the
issue of foreigners - that was a mistake on our part,
and we will issue the correction on that.
Lindsay Williams : We
done on correcting it so promptly. The Business Day
newspaper today had a nice little insert from one of the
major property groups in this country advertising an
estate : "Experience
the breathtaking beauty, and embrace an idyllic
lifestyle where peace, privacy and serenity reigns
supreme". This is 230 hectares
of secure private estate and it's
a beautiful piece of South African land - is this the
sort of thing you’re trying to guard against? Is this
the reason for the announcement today - to safeguard the
environmental future of South African coastal lands - or
is there something else?
Themba Maseko : It's
safeguarding environmental issues, and also the issue of
public access. A lot of these developments - although
not all of them - end up excluding people from access to
the coast. In a sense it amounts to privatising the
beaches of our country, and we feel that's
something that needs to be looked at. The Bill is going
to be published for public comment - we welcome any
views from the public. Essentially the policy is driven
by a desire to protect the national interest which
amounts to essentially making sure the public has access
to the most beautiful parts of our country.
Lindsay Williams : I
agree wholeheartedly there - in other words South
Africa’s beaches should remain in the public domain.
Themba Maseko :
Absolutely.
Lindsay Williams : What
is the process from here? A lot of coastal land has
already been snapped up. Are you hoping to put an
immediate brake on developments?
Themba Maseko : Those
have already been approved, so I suppose there will be
very little to do about that. Essentially the law is
going to propose measures that need to be put in place
to make sure that when municipalities decide to dispose
of land they actually bear in mind that they need to
safeguard these areas, to make sure that the public
still has access, and that all environmental issues are
taken into account. The process is that we will publish
the Bill and invite public comment on what we are
proposing in the hope that when we finalise the Bill we
would have taken into account the views of all South
Africans.
http://www.gcis.gov.za/about/james.htm
Business Day website |
|
|
|
Impact of
energy Acts from 1999 to 2006 : Department Briefing [Parliamentary
Monitoring Group] - 25 October 2006 |
|
|
Economic Affairs Select Committee
Acting Chairperson: Ms ND
Ntwanambi (ANC, W Cape)
Documents handed out :
Powerpoint presentation by Department of Minerals and
Energy : Legislation introduced since 1999 affecting
Provinces and how it has impacted on the people of South
Africa [http://www.pmg.org.za/docs/2006/061025dme.ppt]
Summary
The Department of
Minerals and Energy presented an overview of Energy Acts
introduced since 1999. It gave details of the
legislative changes effected by each Act and what impact
this had had on the people of South Africa. There were a
number of groundwork policies to implement the DME
mandate. The most significant white papers included the
Energy Policy,
the Minerals and
Mining Policy and the
Renewable Energy
Policy. Briefings included the
National Nuclear
Regulator Act, the
National Energy
Regulator Act of 2002, an explanation on mineral
rights, and the
Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act,
and the Diamonds
Second Amendment Act was far reaching. Questions
were asked by members on the two mining accidents in
Carltonville and Barberton, gas, oil and hydropower
possibilities and reserves, lack of electrification in
the Eastern Cape, and the community’s benefits from
platinum in Limpopo. The delays in environmental impact
assessments, the disputes on land with municipalities,
and the composition of the boards were discussed. The
monitoring systems, assistance to small scale miners,
safety issues, equity stakes, and encouragement to women
were also raised. Some of the questions were to be
answered in writing, in view of the shortage of time.
Minutes
Briefings by Department
of Minerals and Energy
Ms Nelisiwe Magubane
(Acting Director General, Department of Minerals and
Energy) apologised for the late circulation of the
documents for the meeting. She introduced the delegation
from the Department (DME). She presented the legal
history of mining in South Africa, including all the new
Acts put into force since 1994. She summarised the
impact that the new legislation had had on the South
African population. There were a number of groundwork
policies to implement the DME mandate. The most
significant white papers included the
Energy Policy,
the Minerals and
Mining Policy and the
Renewable Energy
Policy.
Mr Tseliso Maqubela
(Chief Director for Nuclear Energy, DME) explained the
National Nuclear
Regulatory Act, in which safety was very
important. The Act allowed for the creation of the
National Energy Corporation of South Africa (NECSA) and
the transfer of authority. NECSA was the third largest
producer of radioisotopes in the world and they were
used for nuclear medicines.
Mr Nhahla Gumede
(Acting DDG : Hydrocarbons and
Energy Planning, DME) presented the
National Energy
Regulator Act of 2002, which would have
regulatory authority over the entities covered by the
Electricity Act,
Gas Act
and Petroleum
Pipelines Act. Having a single regulator saved
costs and meant that all energy sectors were treated
equally. He summarised how each Act impacted on the
South African population and in what ways communities
were involved. He also mentioned some of the challenges
to enforcement.
Ms Magubane added that
the Electricity
Regulator Act still needed to be presented to the
NCOP. There were still many houses not electrified, the
Eastern Cape faring worst with only 45% electrified. The
Act did not deal with all the challenges in this area.
Mr G Mfetoane (Deputy
Director : Legal Compliance
and Licencing, DME) presented on the mineral rights
which is really a bundle of rights that are regulated.
These facilitated the empowerment of historically
disadvantaged individuals. Various requirements were in
place to ensure the inclusion of communities and the
beneficiation of resources. There must be women at all
levels.
Ms D Ntombela (Chief
Director : Mineral Regulation
and Administration, DME) presented on the benefits of
the Mineral and
Petroleum Resources Development Act. Since it was
only recently implemented, the benefits were not yet
quantifiable. There were still various challenges that
persisted. The Department did have monitoring tools. One
major challenge that had been overcome was the
resolution of backlogs. Applications took a very long
time to complete but this was similar to other mining
countries.
Mr Mfetoane added that
the impact of the
Diamond
Amendment Act was far reaching. There was now a
one-stop shop. The licences were more than a permit as
they had monetary value. Implementation of the Act had
not yet started.
Discussion
The Acting Chairperson
asked if the Committee could be briefed on the two
incidents reported in the news, both the previous day
and the previous week, concerning trapped miners in an
illegal mine in Barberton.
Mr J Erasmus (Acting
Chief Inspector of Mines, DME) said that the mining
accident the day before had occurred at an Anglo Ashanti
mine in Carltonville. It was 4.1km deep and the accident
occurred 2 000m underground. It was an old mine from
1961. There was a rock burst near the carbon leader
pillar at 14h17. It was a magnitude 2 event and the
miners withdrew immediately. As there was no damage,
they returned to work. At 14h40 there was a magnitude
2.3 event 170m ahead of the work, and major damage was
sustained. Seven people were reported missing. Emergency
action was taken and two miners were uncovered, both of
whom will recover fully. No other miners had yet been
found at that time.
He added that research
in mine health and safety was possible from R34 million
per annum from levies. R5-R7 million per annum was spent
on research on rock bursts. There was a lot of research
into how to predict seismic activity. South Africa was
in the near field; other countries could be kilometres
away. There was ongoing research into the fluid dynamics
of rock and how it responds to mining as well as pillar
extraction methods. There were 30 projects on mechanical
support research for gold mining.
In regard to the
illegal mining accidents, Mr Erasmus said there was
illegal mining in many areas where mining is done for
personal gain. It was not controlled but miners often
ask the Department for help to recover injured miners.
The police could also assist but it was a difficult
situation. In Barberton it was difficult to know where
exactly the body was but it was eventually found.
The Acting Chairperson
noted that two weeks ago members had been on a visit to
Nigeria, examining the possibilities of mutual
investment between South Africa and Nigeria. She asked
for comments to assist with such a process and further
information.
Ms S Chen (DA, Gauteng)
asked the department where the deposits of gas were.
The Acting Chairperson
asked about renewable gas from land fill sites, noting
that the Committee had received a briefing from Eskom
the previous day. She asked whether the DME agreed with
Eskom's Annual Report,
especially with regard to the non-attendance of top
officials and their financial statements. She also asked
for comment whether there were oil reserves on the West
Coast, whether the Department would engage Eskom on
research for hydropower for rural areas, and what the
Department could do in terms of testing, as there were
some rivers in South Africa that did not run dry.
Mr Gumede answered that
there were projects to recover methane as small scale
poser generators. The problem was that the gas could not
be transported and must thus be used in situ. These
projects were supported by the DME. Most of them were at
a pilot stage. DME believed that there were deposits on
the West Coast. Exploration was a challenge as most of
it was offshore. The continental shelf off South Africa
was far deeper than that further north. There was also
no market in South Africa. Namibia had gas fields that
they had known about for 30 years and had not acted on
because there was no market. Gas was not as easy as oil
because of the difficulty in transporting it. DME hoped
to explore and small amounts were being produced but it
did not meet the country’s needs. They hoped more would
happen.
Hydropower was a
project under renewable energy. South Africa did not
have much water. Even though some dams remained full,
there were no large rivers to harvest energy from. The
Department had a renewable energy fund that people
needed to apply for. It was not a lot of money but it
would kick start a project. Communication with SMMEs
about the Petrol Act has not been good. It is mainly
from head office. The plan is to expand into provinces.
The Road Shows from the Minister hope to address such
issues. Big players had taken up most deals. It is a
challenge that they are limited to locations where
refineries already are.
The Acting Chairperson
asked why the Eastern Cape was still lacking
electrification. The Committee had been advised that the
Department had set up a good programme where electricity
as well as a piece job was provided.
The Acting Chairperson
asked what benefits had been given to the people of
Limpopo from the mining of platinum.
Ms Ntombela answered
that with regard to community benefits in Limpopo,
AngloPlatinum was the company with all the rights. They
had not finalised their equity partners. It was not
legislated that communities must participate but DME
encouraged them to do so. The social and labour plan
could implement this. DME did not accept the mine's
plan. Conflicts were the domain of the Department of
Land Affairs. They were still waiting for AngloPlat. The
community did have stakes in Impala mines but this was
not enforceable by law.
The Acting Chairperson
asked who could ensure the speed up of the delays from
environmental impact assessments (EIAs).
Mr D Gamede (ANC, KZN)
noted that the Government had tried to shorten the EIA
process, and enquired whether there had been any change.
He also asked on what grounds were applications rejected
and refused and how were those applicants assisted to
get permits.
Ms Ntombela reported
that there was a catch 22 with EIA delays. They had to
promote mining activity and ensure environmental
rehabilitation. Mining was very destructive and this
could not be overlooked. Currently the EIA must also
include social impacts, especially with the mining of
asbestos. DME was currently rehabilitating old mines. Up
to 48% of their budget was spent on this. DME was facing
it with other Departments through Memorandums of
Understanding. DME would provide 60 days to DEAT or DWAF
for comment, then the application was sent back to DME
for improvement, back to the other Departments for
confirmation and so forth. It was a long process.
The Acting Chairperson
asked why were houses being given to the municipalities
as this provided temptation for corruption.
Ms Ntombela explained
that the land where the houses were developed was
privately owned. The municipality said that they were
entitled to the land according to the legislation.
Houses would still belong to the owners, but the land
would be transferred to the municipality.
Ms M Temba (ANC,
Mpumulanga) commented that the Chairperson had asked
most of the questions. She also commented that the
documents provided were difficult to read.
Mrs Temba asked how the
provinces were represented on the boards, and whether
there were information centres in all the provinces. She
asked how matters started in the North West filtered
down to other provinces. She also asked for confirmation
on the improvement in safety.
Mr Maqubela replied
that the term of office of board members was three years
according to the Act, but it could be renewed for a
further three years. There were only ten board members
that could be appointed. One was drawn from Organised
Labour, one from organised business, one from affected
communities, one from DME, one from DEAT and the others
were appointed at the discretion of the Minister. Some
provinces were given priority in this regard because of
their mining activity. The affected community member was
also from such an area and there was a caucus to elect
them.
Mr Gamede commented
that he had expected a comparative presentation between
1999 and the present but in his view not enough had been
provided. He would have preferred that the information
be broken down into provinces.
Mr Mfetoane answered
that it was an oversight not to make a comparative
presentation. DME took it for granted that this would
not be required because historically disadvantaged
individuals had not been granted licenses prior to 1999,
so there was nothing to compare with.
Mr Gamede asked how the
Department monitored mines to ensure that they were
aligned with the development priorities. He asked
whether mines understood the difference between
integrated development plans and social plans. Mr Gamede
asked how was beneficiation monitored. He noted that
policy was supposed to come from Government but
monitoring was the job of the Department.
Mr Mfetoane said that
in the North West, DME was currently interacting with
companies. DME assesses the integrated development plans
(IDP) and social responsibility plans. If there were
none or if they are inadequate, applications were sent
back with feedback. Most companies accepted this and
more monitoring took place after a year. The Minister
was able to take licences away for non-compliance. The
companies were given time to fix their social and labour
plans after which, if still non-compliant, the Minister
could withdraw the licence. It could also be a criminal
offence punishable by fine or jail term. There was a
checklist for documents that must be submitted with
applications. If they were incomplete they would be
rejected. If all documents were submitted and they did
not comply, then the application was refused. DME, in
order to assist HDIs, would allow resubmission with
changes and help was provided from regional offices.
Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) must include local
communities and cannot choose their own black economic
empowerment (BEE) partners if they were not local. RBM
was still busy with this process.
Mr Gamede enquired what
recourse there was for mines that did not comply with
the law. He also asked how would the Department assist
small scale miners for small deposits that lasted only a
few years.
Mr Mfetoane stated that
funding was available for assisting small scale mining
and there were specific offices that deal with that.
There was legal resource from the Act for a lack of
beneficiation. There was an African mining partnership.
South Africa gave and needed help. It had lost what it
knew originally and must draw lessons from the
indigenous knowledge of the continent. There was an
exchange of beneficiation experience between countries.
Mr Gamede asked how the
Department had obtained the household figures for
Kwazulu Natal, as he was not sure that the number
provided was correct.
Mr Gamede asked for an
update on the progress of safety at Ashanti and whether
there had been any research to stop the problems.
Mr Maqubela stated that
there was increased safety of workers from radiation
when mining. The National Regulators Act ensured that
radiation exposure was not above the international
norms. There had been inspections that revealed that the
mines did conform. The trend was that radiation exposure
decreased from improved regulation. DME still needed
long term monitoring to ensure the health of workers
after they retired. One impact of the legislation was
that it allowed for public participation. The Government
could not just put up a reactor where and when it
wished.
Mr Gamede asked how
were the equity stakes at RBM monitored.
Mr Gamede asked how the
Department would deal with the lack of capacity in
Kwazulu Natal.
Ms Temba asked what
measures were taken to encourage women to take part in
mining.
Ms Magubane said there
was a strategy to deal with the low number of women in
mining. It was difficult but DME were busy with it. DME
itself was a leading Department. They had not met their
10% target. It encouraged mining companies and was
looking at new projects for significant participation.
Black people were also resisting.
Ms Magubane said that
the presenters would have to respond to the unanswered
questions in writing, due to the meeting running
overtime.
The meeting was
adjourned.
Parliamentary Monitoring Group website
Details about
subscribing to the Parliamentary Monitoring Group's service are
available at http://www.pmg.org.za/subscribe.php
|
|
|
|
Protocol of dealing with National
Environmental Management Act (NEMA) environmental impact assessment
(EIA) and of Environment Conservation Act (ECA) EIA applications
during festive period 2006/07 [Western Cape]
- 29 November |
|
|
1. Issuing of ECA
authorisations and NEMA environmental authorisation
The department will issue
the last authorisation in terms of the ECA, 1989 (Act No
73 of 1989) for this calendar year on 8 December 2006
and will recommence with the issuing of ECA
authorisations on 8 January 2007.
Due to the legislated
time frames with respect to the issuing of environmental
authorisations in terms of the NEMA, 1998 (Act No 107 of
1998), no cut-off date may be implemented. It must be
noted that there are a number of public holidays over
this period and that many officials will be taking their
annual leave during the said period. If required,
appropriate arrangements must be made.
2. Public
participation process (PPP)
The department
recommends that the applicant(s) and/or environmental
assessment practitioners (EAPs) do not conduct PPP over
the festive season, ie 15 December 2006 to 7 January
2007.
However, should the PPP
extend into the festive period the department recommends
that the PPP period is adjusted and/or extended to
ensure that those interested and affected parties have
sufficient time to participate in the PPP. Adequate
motivation is, however, required should the applicant
wish to proceed with a PPP during the festive period
(e.g. if the location of the proposed activity is in a
recognised holiday destination such as coastal towns).
3. Submission of
notice of intent, application forms and reports
The department
recommends that applicant(s) and/or EAPs refrain from
submitting notice of intents, application forms and
reports (basic assessment, scoping and EIA) after 8
December 2006. This would ensure that all time frames as
stipulated by the NEMA EIA regulations are adhered to by
all parties concerned. The department will therefore
issue the last acknowledgement letter for the year on 22
December 2006.
Enquiries
:
Mr C Rabie
Director : Integrated
Environmental Management - Region A
Telephone : 021-483
4793
Fax : 021-483
3633
Mr A Barnes
Director : Integrated
Environmental Management - Region B
Telephone : 021-483
4094
Fax : 021-483
4372
Issued by
: Department of Environmental Affairs and
Development Planning, Western Cape Provincial Government
29 November 2006
Source : Western Cape
Provincial Government (http://www.capegateway.gov.za)
SA Government Information website |
|
|
|
Former rugby boss to appeal eviction - 29 November |
|
|
Piet Van Niekerk and
Dineo Matomela
Former national rugby boss and Port Elizabeth
attorney Silas Nkanunu has petitioned the Chief Justice
in Bloemfontein for leave to appeal against an eviction
order from the Humewood house he has been occupying for
the past seven years.
Nkanunu's
lawyer, Moerida Louis, confirmed yesterday that legal
papers had already been filed in the Supreme Court of
Appeal and that she was awaiting a court date.
His latest application
follows a failed application on October 26 in the Port
Elizabeth High Court for leave to appeal against an
eviction order granted on August 1 this year on the
property at 163 Glengarry Crescent in Humewood.
The order by Acting
Judge Piet van der Byl gave Nkanunu 30 days to vacate
the property after several failures to make payments in
terms of a purchase agreement between him and an Irish
businessman, Peter Bruce Mittison, concluded on
September 1 and September 15, 1999.
Nkanunu took occupation
of the property on October 1, 1999.
In terms of the
eviction order, the sheriff of the High Court was
granted permission to remove Nkanunu or any other
occupiers of the house and change the locks.
Louis said the former
president of the SA Rugby Union had moved out of the
house "voluntarily"
while he awaited the outcome of his petition to the
Chief Justice.
An alleged sale of the
house to a third party cannot go ahead until the current
legal matter is settled.
According to Van der
Byl, Nkanunu breached the terms of the R380 000 sale
agreement with Mattison. The terms stated that Nkanunu
had to make a R65 000 once-off payment and then pay the
balance in monthly instalments "in
respect of a bond held over the property"
as well as R500 a month.
He also had to pay
transfer and registration duties, rates, taxes, levies
and water, electricity and sewerage charges.
Van der Byl said that
by April 18 last year, Nkanunu had been R29 666,55
behind on his monthly instalments and by May 3 last
year, his municipal account had been R27 136,39 in
arrears.
Nkanunu had also failed
to give any guarantees for future payments and failed to
pay transfer duties.
In terms of these
failures Nkanunu was an "unlawful
occupier" and should be
evicted, Van der Byl said.
pvniekerk@johnnicec.co.za
The Herald Online website |
|
|
|
Court rules on vegetable planting - 5 December |
|
|
Bob Frean
and Chris Jenkins
The Pietermaritzburg
High Court on Friday interdicted Mkhuze people from
destroying indigenous vegetation in the Greater St Lucia
Wetland Park in order to plant vegetables.
The 48 people cited in
court documents must travel at least 5km to the 2,7ha
and 0,22ha sites in the Ozebeni section of the park
where vegetation has been cleared.
The sites are largely
in water courses which would convey rainwater to Lake St
Lucia which is dangerously low.
Part of the area
cleared consists of peat which is very rare in the
country.
Although the clearing
and planting activities offend the World Heritage
Convention and the National Environmental Acts, police
have not been involved as the officials have decided to
use a "soft" approach.
The indigenous plant
clearing and vegetable cultivation were only discovered
in the past month. The work has mostly been done by
women using hand tools.
Cedric Coetzee,
Conservation Officer of Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, said the
illegal activities would harm the interests of the
affected community in the long term.
The clearing of
indigenous vegetation and vegetable cultivation would
destroy sensitive areas and affect the tourism
potential, he said. The government was keen to develop
tourism as a main economic activity.
The aim of the
interdict is to ensure the conservation and preservation
of the area and indigenous plants.
The area is part of the
Mozambique-Swaziland-South Africa Lubombo spatial
development initiative and would benefit present and
future generations.
According to the
Wetland Park Authority and KZN Wildlife, the situation
arose on November 7 when field rangers found 72 people
from local communities tending planted crops and
clearing more land for cultivation in an area about 5km
into the park and near the ecologically-sensitive Mkhuze
Swamp.
The field rangers
informed the people that what they were doing was
illegal and requested that they immediately stop those
activities.
Staff of both the
Wetland authority and KZN Wildlife attended subsequent
meetings with local traditional authorities,
municipalities and relevant government departments to
try to resolve the issue, but in spite of this the
cultivation continued.
This left both
organisations little option, as an interim measure, to
obtain a court interdict to "stop further destruction of
this ecologically-sensitive area" while they engaged
positively with the relevant communities to "ascertain
and resolve the core issues involved".
Ezemvelo CEO Khulani
Mkhize said the conservation authority was "deeply
concerned about this matter".
"It is obvious that
there are deeper issues at stake here and we as the
custodians of the Wetland Park need to get to the heart
of the matter with the involvement of all stakeholders -
both government and community - as a matter of urgency,"
he said on Monday.
Park Authority CEO
Andrew Zaloumis said another loss such as Dukuduku
Forest would not be allowed to happen.
"At the same time we
will continue engaging our local communities to resolve
this matter in a way that is positive for all parties,"
Zaloumis said.
This article was
originally published on page 7 of
The Mercury
on December 05, 2006
IOL website |
|
|
|
Dispute erupts over operation of sawmill on property at Plett
- 6 December |
|
|
Timothy Twidle
A
dispute has erupted between a group of
Plettenberg Bay residents over a sawmill which is
operating from a home without zoning permission and in
defiance of municipal bylaws.
The owner of the
sawmill admitted yesterday that he was operating without
council permission, but said an application for rezoning
had been lodged.
But the Holt Action
Group say they are concerned that the sawmill, which
they view as an industrial operation, will have a
detrimental affect on their livelihoods. Timber Two
Processors operates the sawmill on a piece of land about
five kilometres outside Plettenberg Bay.
The action group is
made up of 22 residents and owners of small businesses,
such as farming and guest lodges in the Holt Hill area
which straddles the N2 freeway, between Plettenberg Bay
and Knysna. Of particular concern to the group is the
noise and the possibility of pollution from airborne
sawdust.
Group spokesman Paul
Falla, of Fynbos Ridge Country House and Cottages, said
: "The operation of a
sawmill in the vicinity of Holt Hill is out of character
with the rural ambiance of the area".
Timber Two Processors
relocated from Knysna and began operating the sawmill on
its present site earlier this year.
Owner David
Witherington said an application had been submitted to
the Bitou municipality for Timber Two Processors to be
rezoned as an agricultural industry. He said there were
sufficient stands of fully grown trees on either side of
the site to bring the decibel count down to acceptable
levels.
He also said that all
of the dust and wood chips were collected and
successfully recycled for use in farming and the
stabling of horses.
Witherington said all
of the timber processed at his sawmill was from alien
trees and as such he was providing a valuable service to
the community.
Eighty per cent of the
finished planks were exported to countries in the Far
East and Europe.
The sawmill represented
an investment of R5,5-million and provided permanent
employment for 78 people.
Bitou public works
director David Friedman said the matter had been
referred to the legal department.
frank@johnnicec.co.za
The Herald Online website |
|
|
|
Green Point
stands ground on 2010 plan - 4
December |
|
|
Chris Van Gass
Residents of Green
Point, the site of a new stadium for the Soccer World
Cup in 2010, are to press ahead with their objections to
rezoning the area, in spite of a threat by government to
take the semifinal match away from the city if the issue
goes to court.
David Polovin, chairman
of the Green Point Common Association, said at the
weekend that his organisation had lodged a "substantive"
appeal against the development and if a decision went
against them and they did not agree with the reasons,
they would take it on review to the high court. Polovin
said he believed the association's objection was based
on "solid ground" and that the public participation
process around the Green Point development had been
flawed.
The application could
mean that Cape Town and Western Cape would lose out on
the R2,5bn development.
Sport and Recreation
Minister Makhenkesi Stofile and his provincial
counterparts decided last week to recommend that the
cabinet should take a formal decision that all stadiums
had to be finished by the end of 2009 "and that if
residents of Green Point take the matter to court,
another venue be found outside the province of the
Western Cape".
One implication of this
was that practice venues being planned elsewhere in Cape
Town would not be built either.
"I'm hoping that it
doesn't reach that stage, because it's going to affect
lots of things," said Whitey Jacobs, Western Cape MEC
for sport.
So far, Tasneem Essop,
the Western Cape MEC for tourism and development, had
received 19 objections to the rezoning of the Green
Point development, which will see the relocation of the
nine-hole Metropolitan golf course on the common, with
the new stadium being built on part of the existing golf
course.
Mayor Helen Zille
warned during a report-back meeting on the stadium last
week that if the matter went to court, the semi-final
match and all its benefits would probably move to
Johannesburg and a major investment opportunity would be
lost.
Simon Grindrod, the
Independent Democrats' leader in the city council, has
blamed Zille for the "imminent loss" of the stadium,
saying the stadium might now be in serious jeopardy.
Polovin said while the
association was in favour of 2010, the future of Cape
Town should also lie in embracing public open spaces and
Green Point was the only sizeable remaining public open
space in the city. With Sapa
allAfrica website |
|
|
|
Province is now taking control of its properties, says Martin
- 6 December |
|
|
Patrick Cull
Members
of the public were contacting the public works
department daily to inform it about properties that
belonged to the province, MEC Christian Martin said
yesterday.
Replying to the debate
on his department‘s annual report, Martin said in the
Bisho legislature that of the 1 134 properties on the
asset register, 889 had now been vested in the name of
the Province of the Eastern Cape.
Martin said when it
came to property Tit is not as
if we received a province in good state",
adding that many of the problems flowed from the
administration of the former Transkei.
The MEC said that the
disposal of 85 properties was now at Cabinet level with
only their valuation outstanding and once that was
received, they would be sold.
He said the delay in
selling State properties was why only R4,2-million had
been generated in revenue, out of R17,7-million.
Earlier, Pine Pienaar
(DA) pointed to the Auditor-General‘s comment with
regard to unauthorised expenditure.
Of R13,3-million
"supposed to be spent on
poverty alleviation programmes",
R7,3-million had been absorbed in paying consultants and
costs.
Pienaar said these
programmes were "by their very
nature not complex" and did
not require the knowledge of specialised consultants.
"It
was not necessary for consultants to come and eat up
more than half of the money".
Pienaar said he wanted
to know who the consultants were, why they were
appointed and, if the A-G described the expenditure as
"fruitless and wasteful",
why steps were not being taken to get the money back?
Pienaar said that for
the year ending March, 2005, those officially
responsible for property management had not implemented
the recommendations of a special report on leases, with
the result that there were overpayments of R7,7-million.
"A
further R7,6-million in losses were incurred during the
last financial year because we continued to fail to
implement those same recommendations.
"The
pattern for this is set, and it's
simply alarming.
"We
identify the problem. We pinpoint the solution and then
we sit back and do nothing, with the result that we make
the same mistakes over and over".
The report compiled by
the portfolio committee on the department's
annual report noted that the asset register had still
not been completed.
In addition, other
provincial government departments were leasing private
properties while those owned by government were
underutilised.
pcull@johnnicec.co.za
The Herald Online website |
|
|
|
Knysna council backs new hotel at Brenton - 3 December |
|
|
Francois Rank
Knysna's municipal council yesterday approved
plans to build a controversial multi-million-rand hotel
on the Brenton-On-Sea hotel site.
The go-ahead comes
without any
environmental impact assessment being carried
out, a move which has come under fire from
environmentalists in the area.
The original Brenton
Hotel burnt to the ground three years ago when a fire
started in the kitchen on a Sunday afternoon. In October
last year, the land was sold to developers Ocean Estates
International.
An application to
develop the land was turned down earlier this year
because of issues surrounding services capacity,
environmental impacts and aesthetics. The municipality
has also received objections from environmental
organisations and members of the public.
However, the latest
application, which developers claim is more
environmentally friendly, was approved yesterday at the
final council meeting for 2006 after a presentation by
the developer and architect and a brief meeting of
council members.
Knysna chief town
planner Ed Hill said because the application to develop
had been made in 2005 before legislation which governs
EIA practices was put into place, it had not been
necessary to have one done.
"The
area falls under the
Outeniqua
sensitive coastal area regulations which don‘t
require the same extent of EIA",
said Hill.
However, Western Heads
Conservancy chairman Susan Campbell said she believed
environmental regulations would have to be complied with
regardless of whether the application was brought under
old or new environmental legislation.
"Under
the old regulations, the upgrading of a resort was a
listed activity and under the new regulations the
proposed activities within 100m of the high water mark
require compliance with environmental regulations. My
concern is that they are not sticking to the development
footprint of the old hotel. We believe it should not be
exceeded. From an environmental point of view, we have
great reservations regarding the excavation of sensitive
coastal dunes".
Speaking to council
yesterday, development architect Francois Pienaar said
: "We are dealing here
with a site which has a long history and a great
environmental sensitivity. It is a prime site and part
of the Outeniqua sensitive coastal area. This new design
for the hotel is a green building".
Pienaar said the roof
of the hotel would be landscaped with the natural fynbos
which grows in the area. The hotel would also collect
rainwater.
The development would
create around 400 jobs, Pienaar said.
Hill said yesterday's
decision would be circulated amongst those who had
objected to the hotel.
"They
can submit their appeal to the premier, but if the
appeal is dismissed then the developers can submit
building plans for approval".
Pienaar said it was
hoped construction would start within the next four
months.
"Hopefully
we will have a hotel up and running by 2008,"
he said.
Ocean Estates
International is a multinational company which deals in
property in Spain, France Turkey and South Africa.
The company deals
mainly in luxury apartments and villas. Among its major
South African developments are Ocean Quay in Harbour
Island near False Bay and Ocean Reef Zinkwazi in KwaZulu
Natal.
frank@johnnicec.co.za
The Herald Online website |
|
|
|
Port
Alfred waterfront to be proclaimed a heritage site
- 30 November |
|
|
Ivor Markman
The
Provincial Heritage Resources Authority has
declared Port Alfred‘s historic waterfront Wharf Street
area a heritage site.
The decision is
expected to become official after the notice is
published in the next Government Gazette.
The application to have
the Wharf Street area declared a heritage site was
mooted by PHRA councillor John Hughes.
"I
was approached by some interested people and went with
Johan Staats, an architect with PHRA, and did an in
loco inspection," he said.
The PHRA council
decided the Wharf Street area was of such historical
significance that it should be declared a heritage site.
The wharf was built
after the Kowie River was opened to the sea in February
1841 by William Cock, who also built Cock's
Castle, now under threat of demolition by Gauteng
developer Neville Gordon.
At one stage Port
Alfred rivalled Port Elizabeth as a safe harbour and for
more than 40 years the wharf, which could berth up to 10
ships, was possibly the busiest on the south-east coast.
After the old sailing
ships tied up, the chandlers used to offload and
transfer their goods to the warehouses on Wharf Street.
These buildings have now been converted into shops.
Ndlambe municipality
tourism director Bev Young was delighted to hear the
news of the declaration. "I am
thrilled to bits. It's a long
time in coming. What I visualised when I came into
tourism seven years ago was a portion of the town,
especially the older portion, becoming a cultural
tourist walk", she said.
Young's
idea was to meander from the town to the old town where
visitors could sit in the beautiful and historic section
and enjoy a cup of coffee.
"I
think every town needs an old town that's
untouched so that people can actually meander and walk
in and create a cosmopolitan atmosphere,"
she said.
Right behind Wharf
Street is the refurbished railway station, already a
heritage site. "We've
got the station just behind Wharf Street and we have our
very colourful train".
imarkman@johnnicec.co.za
The Herald Online website |
|
|
|
Venerable building to be saved for posterity - 1 December |
|
|
Ivor Markman
The
Provincial Heritage Resources Agency has declared
the Port Elizabeth St George's
Club building a heritage site.
Its decision will
become official when a notice to that effect is
published in the next Government Gazette.
When the club was
founded in May, 1866, it rented D P Blaine's
house in Bird Street. Subsequently, in 1874, it
purchased the property. In 1876, the surrounding
properties were bought and a double-storey wing was
added.
As the coffers of the
club swelled, a decision was taken to demolish the old
buildings and architects Jones and McWilliams were
commissioned to design a new one. The new building was
opened on March 31, 1905, by Governor-General Sir Walter
Hely-Hutchinson.
"I'm
very delighted to hear that the building has been
declared a heritage site. About 20 years ago my
application to have it proclaimed a national monument
was turned down by the board of managers of the Port
Elizabeth Club, because they didn't
favour restrictions being placed on the building in the
event of future renovations,"
said heritage conservationist Tim Bodill.
Built in the style
known as arts and crafts rendered (the English version
of art nouveau) the building was one of the firm's
earliest, said Bodill.
"It
was executed mainly by Victor Thomas Jones, who arrived
in South Africa in 1896, and is based on the design of a
building on the Isle of Wight.
"It
contains a lot of influences from Liberties of London
(who specialised in internal furnishings) in respect of
door handles, cabinet fittings and plaster detailing,"
said Bodill.
The application to
declare was made by PRHA councillor John Hughes, who has
been a member of the club for more than 20 years.
"The
building is magnificent. The architecture is superb and
needs to be preserved. The PRHA council, having had many
meetings in this building, decided it should be
protected," he said.
"The
Port Elizabeth St George's
Club is among other heritage buildings which are going
to be declared heritage sites, including five Lutheran
churches," said PHRA chairman
Monde Mkunqwana.
"(In
order to have a building declared a heritage site) an
application has to be made to the PRHA committeeand all
the legal procedures followed,"
he said.
The future of the
building has now been secured and, should the club
members one day decide to sell the building, the
purchaser will not be allowed to alter it.
Many prominent visitors
to Port Elizabeth, including King George VI and the rest
of the royal family in 1947, have stayed at the club.
When she returned in 1994, Queen Elizabeth II once again
stayed there. The Duke and Duchess of Connaught stayed
there in 1906.
"Hopefully,
it will be good for the club in the sense that we are
now preserving the building,"
said club chairman Gerhard Olivier. "It
is more than 100 years old and that will attract
tourists and other people who want to come in and have a
look at this wonderful property. It is an asset to Port
Elizabeth".
imarkman@johnnicec.co.za
The Herald Online website |
|
|
|
Union wants Waterfront sale blocked - 7
December |
|
|
The Congress of South
African Trade Unions (Cosatu) in the Western Cape has
asked the Competition Commission to block the sale of
Cape Town's V&A Waterfront to a foreign-dominated
consortium.
"We're pretty sure that
we're going to get them to stop it," Cosatu provincial
secretary Tony Ehrenreich said on Wednesday.
He said the letter to
the commission was sent earlier in the day.
In a statement, Cosatu
said the R7-billion sale would be bad for the economy
and bad for the development of a "sustainable economy
that responds to the needs of South Africans".
Cosatu was concerned
that the "crown jewels" of the Cape were being sold off
to foreign interests.
The funding for the
investment would not lead to huge amounts of foreign
direct investment as a significant portion of it was
South African capital.
If models in Dubai were
anything to go by, poorer communities would no longer be
able to afford to visit the Waterfront.
The Waterfront, which
attracts up to 22-million visitors a year, was sold off
by the parastatal Transnet.
The consortium is led
by London & Regional Properties, which holds just over
half of the interest.
The rest is split
between Nakheel, a real estate developer owned by the
Dubai government, and South African black economic
empowerment shareholders - an apportionment that Cosatu
described as "a furtherance of crony capitalism". - Sapa
IOL website |
|
|
|
No tag too high for beach house - 5
December |
|
|
Foreigners are ready to
shell out as much as R21 000 a day to rent certain
properties on the Atlantic Seaboard in the Western Cape.
As the festive season
approaches, many home-owners in popular beachfront areas
of Cape Town may be looking to make a small fortune by
renting out their homes for the peak holiday season.
Pam Golding Properties'
(PGP's) rentals director for the Western Cape Metro
region, Dexter Leite, says the holiday rental market
tends to be heavily focused on the Atlantic Seaboard.
He says he has noted
interest from foreigners seeking rental terms of a month
or two, for example in Hout Bay, where rentals vary from
R1 800 to R3 000 per day in high season, and Llandudno
where the figure can rise as high as R10 000 a day.
Leite adds that there
has been a rise in foreign interest for the months of
January, February and March, at rates of around R20 000
per month.
R21 000 demands
However, he says the
chief holiday rental demand is seen in Clifton, Bakoven,
Bantry Bay and Camps Bay, where owners often vacate
their homes for the high season so as to maximise rental
returns.
"The most popular
period for these rentals is from 20 December through to
6 January, when rentals of up to R4 000 per day can be
achieved - although a few exceptional properties can
demand as high as R21 000 per day," says Leite.
PGP says there is still
a market for both buyers and renters of holiday homes.
PGP's MD for the
Western Cape Metro region, Mick Joyce, says Cape Town's
Western Seaboard remains one of the most popular areas
for buyers of holiday homes, particularly along the long
stretches of beachfront which run virtually
uninterrupted from the Lagoon Beach Waterfront through
Dolphin Beach and Bloubergstrand, up to Melkbosstrand.
"Most of these areas
offer stunning views of Table Mountain and Robben
Island," says Joyce, "with easy access to the beach for
leisure activities including walking, swimming, wind-
and kite-surfing".
R1m for a
one-bedroom
"Prices vary from
enclave to enclave, but typically one can expect to pay
from R1m upwards for a one-bedroomed beachfront
apartment in the Blouberg area.
"Penthouse units can
fetch up to R10m or more".
PGP's Blouberg area
manager Madelon Venter reports that there is also
considerable interest from overseas buyers, including
Germans and UK residents who have purchased holiday
homes in this area.
At recent beachfront
developments such as Portico and Horizon Bay - which
have the added bonus of attracting rental income for
buy-to-let owners capitalising on the holiday home
market - approximately a quarter of all units were
bought by foreign buyers. About half of these were
expatriates, says PGP.
Venter adds that
Melkbosstrand remains an extremely popular holiday home
destination, but says property is scarce and sells at a
premium.
West Coast also
popular
The Lagoon Beach
Waterfront has also reportedly seen a huge rise in
demand as a holiday home destination. PGP says prices
here start from around R26 000/m². Entry-level one-bedroomed
apartments in these developments start at around R1m,
the agents say.
PGP adds that further
up the West Coast, the town of Langebaan remains popular
for holiday homes, particularly those along the
beachfront, with access to the lagoon.
Area manager Stephanie
Wynne Cole says there is a good mix of buyers who
utilise these homes for their own family holidays, and
those who capitalise on the buy-to-let market, with
rentals of around R1 600 to R2 500 per day.
Along the South
Peninsula, the market for holiday homes has quietened
somewhat, according to the agents.
However area manager
Colleen Curtis reports that towns such as Fish Hoek,
Kommetjie and Scarborough remain popular for their
beaches, sea views and laid-back atmosphere.
Prices here are
reported to range from around R700 000 for apartments up
to around R3m for larger homes.
S Suburbs appeal to
resident buyers
Cape Town's Southern
Suburbs tend to appeal to resident buyers rather than
out-of-town holidaymakers, says area manager Peter
Ludwig.
But there is a limited
demand for holiday homes at the very top end of the
price scale, specifically for ambassadorial-type homes
with high security, says PGP.
These are used by
mainly foreign owners who spend a month or two
holidaying in the Mother City. For the rest of the year,
the homes tend to be locked up and maintained by
domestic-, garden- and security staff.
The price tag on such
homes varies, but can reach as much as R45m, say the
estate agents.
Fin24 website |
|
|
|
Book unpacks spatial politics in SA - 5
December |
|
|
In her book, The
Frightened Land : Land,
Landscape and Politics in South Africa in the
Twentieth Century, author Jennifer Beningfield embarks
on a journey to explore the effect that spatial politics
has had on a post-apartheid South Africa. From a
property perspective, she lends a fresh take on the role
of property developers and city councils in our country.
The Frightened Land
focuses on how politics affects land and landscape
affairs, how buildings relate to each other within
cities and how society consequently occupies land and
buildings.
It argues that South
African landscape and architecture should reflect its
own cultural identity. Buildings don't exist "in a
cultural vacuum", states Beningfield, and "contemporary
projects in South Africa tend to be quite themed," she
adds. In light of this she suggests that developers need
to shift their focus from building Tuscan and other
foreign themed properties and direct their energies to
creating buildings that best represent SA.
The writer believes
that land, landscape, politics and property are all
intertwined. "Property value in terms of purchasing, to
me, has to do with making spaces that are meaningful and
I think that's what people should push for." She also
thinks that South Africans "have let developers get
away" and should strive to only buy into ecologically
sustainable South African projects.
She is optimistic about
the proliferation of property developments across SA, as
there is a definite need for more housing. The property
boom was driven by this need and the continued increase
of new developments is a sign of this, "If we didn't
need the houses then the prices wouldn't be so high".
She expresses concern, though, that rising property
values leave out those who are previously disadvantaged
and thus suggests that city councils need a cohesive and
sustainable plan to cater for everyone.
Devising and
implementing such sustainable plans is not easy and
Beningfield admits this is a universal difficulty, not
unique to South Africa. In order to integrate those less
advantaged, the United Kingdom government has a
negotiation system with developers in the planning stage
whereby "any large residential development has to have
provision for low cost housing," thus minimising
economical gaps.
In the same breath,
South Africa needs not only physical but also economic
structures that will change the way people live. As much
as all people are now free to move about as they please,
it takes money to move. She is thus of the opinion that
South African government should aim to integrate people
across economic borders through low income housing
within big developments.
Such a move would mean
more people have quicker access to more services; such
as schools and people can move closer to their
workplaces. Although she does add that some people who
can now afford to move, choose not to. As seen in
Soweto, residents have built a culture that they're
proud of and aim to maintain. This phenomenon can be
said to have led to the millions now being poured into
such areas as the buying power stays within them, which
in Beningfield's view is a positive move.
South Africa and
particularly Johannesburg may not be in danger of
becoming as densely populated as London, for instance,
because they're not as geographically constrained.
However, Beningfield warns against urban sprawl.
She notes that new
developments are often built "in pockets, as gated
communities, they're like little islands really that
don't link into city structures and they can't change
over time the way cities have been able to do, even the
way that Johannesburg has been able to do…they're very
closed and I think we should be looking at more open and
more flexible ways of building houses".
Urban planning is one
way to ensure that every new development is formed to
"fit in as part of the city and not as a little island"
too disconnected from existing buildings. Currently, the
city is speading wide but at a very low density. "I
would argue that we should build more densely in such
areas and compensate for parklands. For example where I
live now [London] our building is six storeys high and
it's built around a park that we share as a communal
space".
Although London is too
dense, she suggests that such strategic placement of
"green space" is a constructive direction in which SA
government should be looking for solutions to curb urban
sprawl and prevent new developments from erasing traces
of SA culture and landscape heritage.
Jennifer Beningfield's
book is due to hit bookshelves in a few weeks but is
available on special order through Routledge and
retailers such as Exclusive Books. The recommended price
for the paperback is R399. - Ntokozo Maseko
For more information
contact +44 (0)1264 343071 or
send an email.
Click here to visit the website.
Property24 website
|
|
|
|
Over 1000
KZN residents restored to ancestral land - 1
December |
|
|
Lavinia Mahlangu
Telephone : 012-314
2175
More than 1000
community members near Stanger in KwaZulu-Natal will be
given back their ancestral land. The community was
forcibly removed 30 years ago by the apartheid
government.
Minister for
Agriculture and Land Affairs, Lulama Xingwana and Kwa-Zulu
Natal's Regional Land Claims Commissioner Sduduzile
Sosibo will give the Kwa-Hlomendini community over 533
hectares of their ancestral land at the Essiena Farm on
Sunday.
"The land will be given
to the community as compensation for the land which they
lost in the 1970s as a result of the forced removals.
The removals formed part of the Group Areas Act No. 36
of 1966," the department said in a statement.
About 1200 community
members including 100 female headed households will
benefit from the settlement of the Hlomendini land
claim. The community will also take ownership of the
sugarcane plantation.
The KwaZulu-Natal MEC
for Agriculture and Environmental Affairs, Mtholephi
Mthimkhulu and the national Chief Land Claims
Commissioner Thozamile Gwanya will be among the guests
attending the event.
Out of 79 696 claims
lodged countrywide by the cut-off date of December 1998,
72 927 claims have been settled so far. These include 64
748 urban and 8179 rural claims.
The Commission has
settled up to 92 percent of claims lodged.
The 6 769 outstanding
rural claims which include, largely farmland and
conservation land, are now being speeded up to meet the
March 2008 deadline to have settled all land claims.
Minister Xingwana will
also conduct the provincial launch of the Ilima-Letsema
campaign during the hand over ceremony on Sunday.
The Ilima-Letsema
campaign is a move by government to address the under
utilisation of farm lands held by communities.
"The campaign is aimed
at mobilising members of the community to make optimal
use of the land at their disposal," said the statement.
The campaign also
encourages beneficiaries of land from the state to
utilise it appropriately.
The
campaign has been be rolled out in other provinces,
including the Eastern Cape and Mpumalanga, where the
communities have been called upon to group themselves
together and use government's agriculture assistance
programmes.
One such programme is
the Micro Agricultural Finance scheme of South Africa,
which is a credit scheme for the agricultural sector,
administrated by the Land Bank on behalf of the
Department of Agriculture.
It extends micro
credit, savings, insurance and payment facilities to
economically active poor rural households, small farmers
and agri-businesses. This scheme provides loans of up to
R100 000, payable over 12 months.
Another scheme is the
Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP)
which aims to provide post settlement support to land
reform beneficiaries, as well as other producers.
Mpumalanga's
agriculture and land administration department spent its
entire R26.12 million CASP budget this year, providing
poor households, emerging and small-scale farmers
with support.
These funds were
distributed across 63 CASP projects by fencing in crop
fields and grazing land, providing irrigation
infrastructure, animal handling infrastructure, green
houses, boreholes and dip tanks.
BuaNews Online website |
|
|
|
Orania residents glad land claim is settled -
5 December |
|
|
Andre
Grobler
The Orania Movement expressed satisfaction on Tuesday
with the settlement of a land claim that involved part
of their separatist Afrikaner enclave in the Northern
Cape.
"The
settlement between the Land Claims Commission and the
group of former residents of Orania is good news,"
spokeswoman Eleanor Lombard said
It
involves a financial compensation settlement of R2.9
million that the state would pay to the claimants.
"With
this any possible right on the land of Orania has
lapsed,” said Lombard, who added that the land claim was
not against Orania itself.
The
claim was instituted by about 20 families whom the
department of water affairs moved them from
Grootverwacht, which is part of Orania, in 1991.
They were settled at
surrounding towns such as Luckhoff, Hopetown,
Petrusville and Warrenton.
Orania was bought on
tender from the department in 1990 and part of the
agreement between the founders of Orania and the
department was that all the then inhabitants of the
Orania town complex should move out.
The department would
have arranged for alternative homes.
Lombard said the
settlement was in line with the Northern Cape Land Claim
Commissioners initial standpoint that Orania was a
settled community that should not be disrupted.
"The
leaders of Orania, after the announcement of the claim
last year, met with the commission and it was agreed
that the claim would be handled in a way that avoids
conflict.
"It
was good that the settlement could be handled this way".
Lombard said Orania
residents were pleased by the news that the claim was
finally over.
"It
means the economic development of Orania can continue
whole heartedly".
Lombard said the
favourable settling of the land claim would encourage
business confidence and economic growth in Orania.
- Sapa
Citizen website |
|
|
|
Land
claim on T'kei army base 'being settled' -
6 December |
|
|
The
Land Claims Commission is still settling a land
claim submitted by the Caguba community of Port St Johns
in respect of the former military base, Agriculture and
Land Affairs Minister Lulu Xingwana said in Bhisho
yesterday.
Replying to a written question from Donald Lee (DA), the
minister said that among the issues that still needed to
be resolved were the outstanding electricity debts that
had to be settled between the public works department
and Eskom, the eviction of illegal occupants from the
military base and provision of alternative land by the
Port St Johns municipality.
She said the Land
Claims Commission was awaiting the valuation report from
the independent professional valuator.
Xingwana said the
claimants had opted for the restoration of land,
"as they want to use the land
for development purposes".
"The
land will be restored to the claimant community. If
there is any portion needed by the municipality for a
housing development, this will be discussed with the
community and the municipality".
The Herald Online website |
|
|
|
Egypt to
dig up pharaonic tombs - 2 December |
|
|
Heba Saleh
Bulldozers have moved
in to demolish houses in the Egyptian village of Qurna
which sits on top of dozens of pharaonic tombs in Luxor.
The Egyptian government is
determined to move the 3 200
families of the village to an alternative settlement it
has built a few kilometres away.
Officials say emptying out the
village will enable them to explore the tombs and to
protect them from water damage.
An official ceremony was held
and the bulldozers moved in.
They demolished four uninhabited
mud brick houses in the village of Qurna, very near the
Valley of the Kings in Luxor.
Many villagers have already left
to the new settlement of Taref built by the Egyptian
government at a cost of $31m (£15.6m).
Qurna sits above dozens of
ancient Egyptian tombs, part of the huge necropolis of
Thebes on the west bank of Luxor.
Valuables sold
Over the years, the villagers
are believed to have dug many of the tombs under their
houses and to have sold much of what was in them.
But officials say now they will
be able to further explore the tombs and to protect them
from water damage coming from the village.
The government has wanted to
move the Qurnawis for 60 years but it is only now that
it has completed an alternative village for them.
Many villagers, however,
complained that the new houses are too small for their
families and that they are being cut off from their
fields and their livelihoods in the tourist trade.
The governor of Luxor says it
will take a month and a half to demolish the village but
some Qurnawis insist they will not leave.
BBC News website |
|
|
|
Skyscraper row
hits city of tsars [Russia] - 29 November |
|
|
A bitter dispute has
erupted in St Petersburg over the Russian energy giant
Gazprom's plan to build a skyscraper in the historic
city centre.
Gazprom is considering bids from
seven world-famous architects competing to build the "Gazprom-City"
business centre by the River Neva.
The head of the Hermitage
Museum, Mikhail Piotrovsky, says the project would wreck
the city's "unique aura".
St Petersburg is famous for its
fine 18th and 19th Century buildings.
The city centre is listed by
Unesco as a world heritage site.
Gazprom wants its new
headquarters to soar to 300m (990ft), just opposite the
famous Smolny Cathedral.
The state-controlled energy
giant sees it as a prestige project that would boost the
international image of St Petersburg - home city of
President Vladimir Putin - which has benefited less from
Russia's boom than Moscow.
But Mr Piotrovsky warned that
such architecture "ages very quickly" and "visitors get
pleasure from the unique aura of St Petersburg".
"If we destroy its aura, we will
lose the economic foundation for our future existence,"
he said.
The St Petersburg Union of
Architects has also voiced opposition to Gazprom's plan.
The rival architects on the
shortlist include Rem Koolhaas, Jean Nouvel and Daniel
Libeskind, who is involved in the Ground Zero project in
New York.
Gazprom chairman Alexei Miller,
quoted by the St Petersburg Times, insisted that the
city's citizens "will be proud of these new
architectural masterpieces".
BBC News website |
|
|
|
'A radical streamlining of the planning system'
[UK] - 5 December |
|
|
Charles Clover
A review of the green
belt around England’s towns and cities is part of a
radical streamlining of the planning system recommended
in a report for the Treasury by Kate Barker today.
Miss Barker, a member
of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, also
wants a new system for planning nuclear power stations
in which ministers’ decisions would be replaced by those
of panels of experts.
She concludes that the
planning system has "a
profound influence on our quality of life"
but is "unnecessarily slow,
unpredictable, expensive and bureaucratic".
She says that to ensure
a sufficient supply of land, only 8.3 per cent of which
is urban in England, local and regional authorities
should conduct a review of green belt boundaries where
these are too tightly drawn. She indicated she meant
places such as Cambridge, not Manchester.
She also backed a new
streamlined system of planning for major public
projects, with ministers issuing strategic policy and an
independent Planning Commission making detailed
decisions about the siting of nuclear power stations and
incinerators.
The changes she
recommends to planning procedures are pointedly headed
by the tearing up and rewriting of the long-winded
planning guidance drawn up in Labour’s own reforms.
She wants the planning
policy statements which got longer and more
incomprehensible under John Prescott to be revised so
that they are shorter and clearer.
She wants local
authorities to revise their plans in 18-24 months
instead of the current 36-42. This she says could save
local authorities £100 million over three years.
She wants to see a
significant reduction in the paperwork needed to support
planning applications – helping to reduce the fees paid
by businesses, particularly small businesses wanting to
expand.
Householders would be
allowed to put solar panels and wind turbines on their
roofs without planning permission. Minor changes to
commercial premises would also be deregulated.
Faster appeals – all to
take place within six months from 2008/9 – and a 50 per
cent reduction in the number of cases called in for
ministers decisions by local officials are also called
for. Where local authority plans are indeterminate and
do not give guidance, she says applications should be
approved unless there is good economic, social or
environmental reason.
She backs existing
policy on supermarkets being sited as close as possible
to the centre of towns but is likely to enrage food
campaigners by her recommendation that planners should
no longer assess whether there is a need for a new
Tescos.
Telegraph website |
|
|
|
Extensions 'do not need planning permission' [UK]
- 5 December |
|
|
Matthew Moore
Homeowners and small
businesses should be allowed to build extensions without
seeking full planning permission, according to an
influential Treasury report released today.
Kate Barker, a member
of the Bank of England's monetary policy committee, has
published a series of proposals aimed easing Britain's
housing shortage and freeing up the authorities to
concentrate on larger infrastructure projects.
Her report proposes
exempting small extensions and loft conversions from the
need for planning permission, if neighbours consent to
the plans. Small commercial developments should also be
rubber-stamped, if they have "little wider impact" on
their surroundings.
Miss Barker recommends
that local authorities take a more "positive" approach
to planning applications, with a presumption in favour
of approval "unless there is good reason to believe that
the environmental, social and economic costs will exceed
the respective benefits".
The average wait for
planning applications to be processed should be halved
to between 18 and 24 months.
The cost and paperwork
of making applications should also be cut, and local
planning bodies encouraged to review their green belt
boundaries to ensure local development needs are not
restricted, according to the report.
A new independent
commission should also be set up to adjudicate on larger
infrastructure projects, the report recommends.
Environmental
campaigners have warned that the proposals will give
business and supermarket chains a bigger say in the
decision making process and would lead to extra
development on green belt land.
Friends of the Earth (FoE)
said proposals in the Barker Review of the Planning
System would have "a devastating impact on the
environment and local democracy".
The green pressure
group said the review focused exclusively on how recent
planning reforms affect businesses and how the system
can be improved for their benefit.
The review team was not
asked to consider other aspects of planning such as
protection of the environment or ensuring communities
have a say on local developments, FoE said.
Telegraph website |
|
|
|
Public could be sold shares in prisons [UK] - 2
December |
|
|
Philip Johnston
Property investors
could be given the chance to take a stake in a prison
under an innovative scheme being studied in Whitehall.
Officials may use a
''buy to let’’ scheme introduced in the Budget as a way
of raising private capital for extra cells to ease the
prison overcrowding crisis.
John Reid, the Home
Secretary, has promised an extra 8,000 places, half of
which would be provided on exisitng sites and the rest
through building new prisons.
However, the Treasury
is unwilling to find the extra money, forcing finance
managers to look at alternative sources of cash.
One possible option is
to use a Real Estate Investment Trust (Reit), which are
popular around the world and will be introduced in
Britain next year.
Companies and even
individuals would be invited to invest in a new-style
property company that would build the jails and then
rent them out to private prison operators.
This would provide a
steady guaranteed dividend from the "rental
income", especially if the
prison numbers continue at such historically high
levels.
This week, the
population broke the 80 000
barrier for the first time. Mr Reid wants to build three
new privately-run super-prisons, each housing 1
300 inmates, double the normal capacity.
The Home Office said
all kinds of innovative financial schemes were being
looked to bring private capital into prisons, and Reits
were among them. They offer tax exemptions and are
designed to encourage a wider range of investors in
property beyond the over-heated housing market.
This model has already
been used in the United States by the Corrections
Corporation of America to finance several new privately
run jails.
Harry Fletcher, of the
probation union Napo, said the idea was ''absurd"’
and would have the perverse incentive of working against
Government policy to reduce prison numbers.
"The
Treasury has refused to finance a conventional
prison-building programme so Mr Reid is having to go to
extreme lengths to find the money. Under this scheme
shareholders would have a vested interest in seeing that
the jails were full as the more rent that would come in,
the higher the dividends".
Telegraph website |
|