From the KZNLS and its libraries

Words and Deeds

Current news in the field of Property Law

30 June 2004


  Contents  

In the News
Pay up or lose your home
Rise in home ownership could widen access to financial services, says report
Single mom gets half house price back
Weblog - http://knowgozone.blogspot.com

 

  IN THE NEWS 
Pay up or lose your home  - 30 June
Increasingly hard-pressed KZN property owners received mixed news yesterday. In Pietermaritzburg, where the incidence of rate defaults has increased sharply over the past five years, errant owners could find themselves homeless since the municipality has obtained a high court order permitting it to sell 7 000 properties without consulting the owners.

In Durban, meanwhile, thousands of ratepayers who are in arrears will breathe a sigh of relief now that the eThekwini Municipality Executive Committee has agreed to postpone the auction of their homes for a year.

The court action in Pietermaritzburg represents a desperate attempt by the Msunduzi Municipality to recover rate arrears totalling almost R204 million.

The head of the city's Treasury Department, Farhad Cassimjee, said on affidavit that the arrears on 2003 rates alone were about R38 million.

In addition the arrears for previous years were more than R166 million.

Attached to court papers is a list of 7 500 property owners who are in arrears and whose properties could fall under the auctioneer's hammer if they fail to pay soon.

Cassimjee said the municipality hoped it would not be necessary to execute the court order - which was granted by Judge Atkins Moleko yesterday - on the basis that owners would pay their arrears rather than face losing their properties.

Cassimjee said a review of the performance of the past showed that in 1998, 12.34% of ratepayers were in arrears. By 2003, this had risen to 22.86%, resulting in the municipality's cash flow being severely affected.

The municipality was also the recipient of a restructuring grant from the national Treasury and it was a condition of the grant that the municipality had to reduce its book debt.

Agreements

"Failure to recover the outstanding debt could result in the withdrawal of future grants from the national treasury and/or payment of the existing grant. This would be a severe setback for the restructuring process."

The judge ordered that the order be published in English and isiZulu in local 

newspapers, together with a statement by the municipality that if the amounts owing were paid, then the sale of the properties concerned would not take place.

In Durban, thousands of late ratepayers will be relieved to hear that the executive committee has agreed to postpone auctioning their homes. But the committee said that if their debts had not been settled within the year, appropriate court action would be taken.

On May 13, pandemonium broke out at the Durban High Court as owners of 2 825 properties, including farms and residential flats, shoved and scrambled for court documents to oppose arrear rates notices and stop their properties from being repossessed or sold.

The auction of those properties, whose owners owed R186 million, was due last Monday. Only 641 home owners had indicated they would defend the sale of their properties.

The DA, the only party to oppose the postponement, said the postponement had not been officially authorised.

DA caucus leader Lynn Ploos van Amstel said the postponement was "unfair" to other ratepayers who had scrambled for funds to pay their debts.

"We should be setting an example as the municipality because ratepayers have had 18 months to pay these debts.

Other people had to go to loan sharks and now face hefty interest on their loans. We targeted rates defaulters who own houses worth more than R100 000 and these owners can afford to pay their debts," she said.

At yesterday's exco meeting it was said it was "obvious" that many families could not afford to pay their accumulated debt.

Exco decided to enter into monthly agreements with ratepayers to settle their arrears over 12 months.

No action was taken against owners whose properties had a value of less than R100 000 or where ratepayers had a debt of less than R2 500.

The Mercury website

see also article on Witness website

We have every hope of having a copy of the Court's decision
in our clutches by 10am tomorrow
Should you share our optimism and require a copy of this decision, please e-mail either
help@lawlibrary.co.za or mary@lawlibrary.co.za 


top

Rise in home ownership could widen access to financial services, says report - 30 June
Home ownership increased by 16.3 percent between 1996 and 2001, according to the latest findings of Labour Market Frontiers, a research publication of the Reserve Bank that looks at socioeconomic issues.

The publication argues that such ownership could encourage lenders to use titled property as collateral and thereby widen access to financial services.

Lebo Lehutso-Phooko, the head of the bank's labour and social research unit, said: "Since ownership of formal dwellings can serve as collateral in the mainstream financial sector, evidence from the 1996 and 2001 censuses shows that formal housing has increased from 56.5 percent of total ownership to 72.1 percent."

At the same time, the study shows that informal housing ownership has declined over the same period.

"This relative decline in informal housing ownership may reflect the emergence of a larger black middle class, as well as the expanded allocation of housing among low-income households as part of the reconstruction and development programme," the publication said.

According to Lehutso-Phooko, this decline in informal housing, coupled with an increase in formal dwelling ownership, "potentially deepens access to credit and subsequent mainstream economic and financial participation".

Statistics on formal dwelling ownership show that relatively more male-headed households own formal dwellings than female-headed households.
"An analysis of the two censuses, however, indicates that inroads are being made into bridging this gender gap in housing ownership," said Lehutso-Phooko.

"Formal dwelling ownership among female-headed households has increased from 1.4 million households in 1996 to 1.85 million in 2001, an increase of 40.7 percent."

She said at the same time, male-headed households that owned formal housing had increased from 2.54 million, or 64.4 percent, to 2.7 million.

"These shifts translate to an effective increase of 32.2 percent in female dwelling ownership as compared with a rise of 6.2 percent among male-headed households," she said.

The publication said financial institutions were being evaluated on their ability to draw the poor and marginalised into the arena of banking and other formal financial services that provided credit.

"However, most are still reluctant to widen their scope and risk of lending to include those without adequate forms of capital, which may be converted to collateral.

"Formal dwelling ownership potentially provides collateral that could mitigate against credit rationing and could open doors to finance, thereby facilitating small to micro enterprise development and employment creation," Lehutso-Phooko said.

Business Report website

Single mom gets half house price back - 30 June
[al weer daar onder]

A magistrate has ordered one of Victoria's biggest rural real estate developers to refund a single mother of three half the price she paid for a house after she had been duped into paying far more than it was worth.

The developers sold the house to the woman, a first home buyer on a pension, in dealings the magistrate said were misleading and deceptive and/or unconscionable conduct.

The verdict by magistrate Bernard Coburn in the Ballarat Magistrates Court is being hailed as a significant victory for Consumer Affairs Victoria, which took the case to court.

Consumer Affairs Minister John Lenders described the decision as fantastic for consumers.

Mr Coburn said Kellie Jane Brown had paid $55,984 for the house she could have had for $26,000.

The director of Consumer Affairs Victoria, David Cousins, took the case against Astvilla Pty Ltd, Perna Pty Ltd and Livio Cellante, on behalf of Ms Brown, who bought the house at 11 Bowman Street, Warracknabeal, in 2001.

Livio Cellante is general manager of the two companies. His sons, Romano and Massimo Cellante, are the directors and shareholders. The Cellante family also runs Vic Properties in Templestowe Heights.

The owner of the house had been trying to sell it for seven or eight years but Luke Wissell, an employee of Astvilla, had told Ms Brown if she did not sign up immediately, the house would be "snapped up overnight".

Mr Coburn also outlined a series of sales techniques he said had been deliberately employed by the defendants to restrict Ms Brown's chances to establish the fair price, while Jeanette Porto, office manager for both companies, had discouraged Ms Brown from hiring a solicitor.

Mr Coburn described this as "a logical step in the defendant companies' sales strategy of ensuring Ms Brown had no

access to advice other than theirs". Perna Pty Ltd had also omitted information from documents that would have alerted Ms Brown to the date when Perma bought the property and the amount they paid.

"The efforts to keep Ms Brown ignorant continued on when the contract of sale was prepared, with vital material excised," the magistrate said.

Mr Coburn also found that Livio Cellante had deliberately delayed Ms Brown from getting possession of the property because one of the defendant companies had yet to buy it.

She was also shown the property on a Sunday, preventing her from getting information from other agents in the area.

The magistrate described the defendants as "uncaring" of Ms Brown's rights.

The magistrate said because Ms Brown relied on misleading, deceptive and/or unconscionable conduct of the three defendants, she paid $29,984 more than the true value of the property. He ordered the defendants to refund her that amount and to pay her $1600 compensation for the extra rent she paid while waiting to get possession of the house.

The magistrate found Perna sold the house when it did not yet own it. Observing that the defendants were still doing that, the magistrate issued an injunction restraining them from claiming they were the owners of properties when they were not.

Documents showed the Cellante group had bought 30 properties in the area for an average of $20,772 and sold them for an average of $48,433.

The defendants also showed Ms Brown houses that were in such a state of disrepair that she would then look more favourably on the overpriced house in Bowman Street.

The Age website


top

 


Any information given to you is provided as a service only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, legal advice
Our privacy policy is available at www.lawsoc.co.za/nlsprivacypolicy.htm and our general terms of use and disclaimer in respect of our websites and our services are available at www.lawsoc.co.za/disclaimer.htm


websites:   
www.lawlibrary.co.za   
www.lawsoc.co.za   

e-mail:   
help@lawlibrary.co.za   

  telephone:  
 031-301 1621   
033-345 1304